Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker)
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:32:32 -0700
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:23:31PM -0500, Ron wrote:
Perfect, those changes are just right. We might want to make similar changes to smb-check-vulns for Conficker, and maybe to http-iis-webdav-whatever. Those were all timely scripts that don't need to be noisy in a stable release.
Makes sense to me. If you're able to make those changes, that would be great!
(I also full agree about automatically upping the verbosity if a script is run explicitly)
I've got an item in TODO (for post-stable) on that: o Consider making it easier to tell whether scripts were specified by name on the command-line (rather than default or by class) so they have the option of providing extra verbosity in that case. For example, see http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2009/q2/0563.html. We could either provide a special function for scripts to determine that, or we could magically adjust nmap.verbosity() when called by those scripts. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Fyodor (Jun 03)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Kris Katterjohn (Jun 03)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 03)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Fyodor (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Fyodor (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 04)
- Re: NSE output verbosity (p2p-conficker) Ron (Jun 04)