Re: RFC on Nping: Raw packet probing nirvana

["Luis M." <luis.mgarc () gmail com>]

Hi Doug.

Sure, I'll add your request to the requirements document. I'll flag it
as a CouldHave, so even if there's no time for it during this summer,
the feature gets implemented at some point.


Best regards,


Luis.


doug () hcsw org wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 12:01:26PM -0300 or thereabouts, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
>   
> > Let me remind you all that transparent proxying is easily detectable using the QSCAN method....
> > More info here:
> > http://archiver.mailfighter.net/nmap-dev/2007/Sep-Oct-Nov-Dec/0079.html
> >     
>
> Thanks for reminding me Buanzo.
>
> This is one thing I think would be great for Nping unless it's
> too difficult and/or too late to add to the requirements. I think
> nping should implement the student's t test to compare data-sets
> of timing information as done in QSCAN:
>
> http://hcsw.org/nmap/QSCAN
>
> Actually it's probably best to incorporate Poul-Henning Kamp's
> ministat.c code. I would've used it for QSCAN if I'd known about it
> at the time:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ministat&manpath=FreeBSD+8-current
> http://sources.freebsd.org/RELENG_7/src/tools/tools/ministat/ministat.c
>
> Best,
>
> Doug
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://SecLists.Org


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org