Re: Nmap 4.85BETA7 Released!

[henry.nymann () valeosylvania com]

David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote on 04/02/2009 09:44:01 AM:

> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:28:43AM -0400, henry.
> nymann () valeosylvania com wrote:
> > >   o Add helpful text for the two most common errors seen in the
> > >     Conficker check in smb-check-vulns.nse.  So instead of saying
> > >     things like "Error: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED", output is like:
> > >     |  Conficker: Likely CLEAN; access was denied.
> > >     |  |  If you have a login, try using
> > --script-args=smbuser=xxx,smbpass=yyy
> > >     |  |  (replace xxx and yyy with your username and password). Also
try
> > >     |  |_ smbdomain=zzz if you know the domain. (Error
> > > NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED)
> > >     The other improved message is for
> > >     NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND. [David]
> >
> > I downloaded and tried the new beta 7 version this morning.
Specifically,
> > I'm running it on a Windows 2003 SP2 server, and I uninstalled beta 6
> > first.  However, I am not getting the new messages that this e-mail
> > references, so does that mean something did not update correctly on my
> > server?  Doing a "Help | About" confirms the beta 7 version.
>
> The only added help messages are for the errors NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
> and NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND. If you weren't getting those errors
> before then you won't get any new output. Specifically, if all you saw
> was "Likely CLEAN" or "Likely INFECTED" then nothing in the output will
> change.
>
> David Fifield

I get many of the NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED and
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND responses during my scans.  With the beta 7
version I am still getting those responses.  I get very few "likely clean"
messages, and no "likely infected" messages (so far).

Henry Nymann
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s).
The information contained therein may be confidential or privileged, and its disclosure or reproduction is strictly 
prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please return it immediately to its sender at the above address and destroy it. 


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org