Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Ncrack discussion
From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:13:36 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ithilgore wrote:
What happens if the user knows that the above hosts' services listen on non-default ports? He should be able to specify that like this: Ex2: $ ncrack 10.0.0.*, 192.168.1.1, www.google.com -p399, 4531 -s ftp, svn This means that the user knows that the targets all have an ftp service that listens on port 339 (non-default) and an svn service that listens on port 4531(non-default). The port list -p option and the -s service-name option should be 1-1.
I don't like the idea of using two different options to specify the same information. This may be OK if every port is a non-default, but if you're specifying more than a couple of ports with most of them being the defaults for services, then will end up being a pain having to specify the same information twice. Like this: ncrack -p 21,22,23,80,666 -s ftp,ssh,telnet,http,ftp All that extra stuff to say that ftp is also listening on port 666. Unless I'm just missing something here? Off the top of my head, what about something like "proto:port" being supported by -p instead of using -s like this? Then the previous example turns out like this: ncrack -p 21,22,23,80,ftp:666 I haven't given these a lot of thought because I'm quite busy, so this is kind of a quick brain-dump on the topic.
Cheers, ithilgore
Thanks, Kris Katterjohn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJKDG1gAAoJEEQxgFs5kUfuRzYP/ijgLl1w3ObzX/4cZbJMUI8O glyfAaTMMfqi2LRu36e1M2UWtcd615nuhGRKR4VL+fdx9L6VCBCGx8vk1mkJhcWZ Qt8lrJgmx3CxgSYn8kyUOKgI6zYt0ieq0hpswK4GVEw68L1DzRBl9wrmvov0lxv5 Q2HjR+5gC6ESz/WzTsMhAD7VHRU8YIDi2oqNDtRgflP03jVYh0IzeeJjw7FCzxcM cOjsP1gLmySv+MEucQXbscs5gIPajphJuEkDVZXJy0hyA660DrIlJAF2dNQEMznW RFDYdmmCnkkDpyx7YQBqjchRtzZCSDGm/ePQg2Dqc8mznpVe9LWCtvIkiU9nyEZt WHnlFPgraalXl9Mc3orz160jXscJx5Azn02O0RXDEf8KyDPtMP0L20s5W1OOCU3q vMrHFyQkunUyYmmZEqYWXDMa6pk6pUfg4TTKm3fIrbQo373C1OXVr160stno6Ylx ctfW0RGh9/NQxwcknqM8W4ZThPCWtBL33kDUTrmpnFl/tccX0euFn3NYkKoieUCw OCEptazELoh6eSPdDpuYmlllnbUrdjgixYoacO6drNXl9TSTD8sEub4OGy2+rIZF du17lYeeS+MDzq2QNOrYpbE9bQ3bYTT9OpAC4r3jxsE5lMRyw1Z3e8FC3NgGrzvW /yGJeyVB/P+Ry5rtiUHH =MeZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Ncrack discussion ithilgore (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion Kris Katterjohn (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion sara fink (May 16)
- Re: Ncrack discussion ithilgore (May 16)
- Re: Ncrack discussion Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion Kris Katterjohn (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion jah (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion ithilgore (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion jah (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion ithilgore (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion doug (May 14)
- Re: Ncrack discussion Dnucna (May 15)
- Re: Ncrack discussion ithilgore (May 14)