Nmap Development mailing list archives
still confused
From: maillist <maillist () securityoveride com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:56:05 -0500
First of thank you to everyone for taking you time to answer my questions and being so helpful after some further investigation into port 80 on my host securityoveride.com i discovered that the port would change from open to filtered just by doing a bunch of scans one right after each other i also followed this on wireshark and could see that a [SYN,ACK] was sent back for every [SYN] even the ones that said filtered. So im still confused Starting Nmap 4.76 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-01-11 16:42 GMT Interesting ports on 168.97.8.67.cfl.res.rr.com (67.8.97.168): PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp filtered http Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 3.42 seconds bt ~ # nmap securityoveride.com -p80 Starting Nmap 4.76 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-01-11 16:42 GMT Interesting ports on 168.97.8.67.cfl.res.rr.com (67.8.97.168): PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp open http Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.84 seconds bt ~ # nmap securityoveride.com -p80 Starting Nmap 4.76 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-01-11 16:42 GMT Interesting ports on 168.97.8.67.cfl.res.rr.com (67.8.97.168): PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp open http Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.38 seconds bt ~ # nmap securityoveride.com -p80 Starting Nmap 4.76 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-01-11 16:42 GMT Interesting ports on 168.97.8.67.cfl.res.rr.com (67.8.97.168): PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp open http Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.51 seconds bt ~ # nmap securityoveride.com -p80 Starting Nmap 4.76 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-01-11 16:42 GMT Interesting ports on 168.97.8.67.cfl.res.rr.com (67.8.97.168): PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp filtered http Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.02 seconds bt ~ # _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- still confused maillist (Jan 11)
- Re: still confused Michael Pattrick (Jan 11)
- Re: still confused maillist (Jan 11)
- Help on parsing XML Speziale Daniele (Jan 12)
- Re: Help on parsing XML David Fifield (Jan 12)
- Re: still confused Michael Pattrick (Jan 11)