Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: nmap and routing problems
From: Peter Gordon <peter () pg-consultants com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:25:30 +0200
Hi. Here is the information you requested. As you can see, route -n is empty, as is /proc/net/route. "ip route" apparently does not write to /proc/net/route - on the other hand I don't know if or where it does write to. Peter 10.19.1.30:~# route route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 10.19.1.30:~# nmap -iflist nmap -iflist Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2009-02-19 10:13 IST ************************INTERFACES************************ DEV (SHORT) IP/MASK TYPE UP MAC lo (lo) 127.0.0.1/8 loopback up eth0 (eth0) 10.19.1.30/16 ethernet up 00:20:30:10:D8:9A br0 (br0) 10.30.12.30/16 ethernet up 00:20:30:12:F5:CA ROUTES: NONE FOUND(!) 10.19.1.30:~# route -n route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 10.19.1.30:~# cat /proc/net/route cat /proc/net/route Iface Destination Gateway Flags RefCnt Use Metric Mask MTU Window IRTT 10.19.1.30:~# ping -I eth0 10.10.10.71 ping -I eth0 10.10.10.71 PING 10.10.10.71 (10.10.10.71) from 10.19.1.30 eth0: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.10.10.71: icmp_seq=1 ttl=127 time=17.9 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.71: icmp_seq=2 ttl=127 time=0.483 ms C-c C-c^C --- 10.10.10.71 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1014ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.483/9.233/17.983/8.750 ms 10.19.1.30:~# nmap -e eth0 10.10.10.71 nmap -e eth0 10.10.10.71 Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2009-02-19 10:14 IST sendto in send_ip_packet: sendto(6, packet, 28, 0, 10.10.10.71, 16) => Network is unreachable Sleeping 15 seconds then retrying C-c C-ccaught SIGINT signal, cleaning up On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 08:54 -0700, David Fifield wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:11:19AM +0200, Peter Gordon wrote:I am using the latest nmap, nmap-4.85BETA3, on a Debian system, running kernel 2.6.26. The setup is like this: I have several NICs on the computer, one of which is connected to the network which I wish to inspect. There are no default routes in the default routing table. All routing is performed with ip route Typically, "ip route list table all" gives 10.19.0.0/16 dev eth0 table eth0_table scope link default via 10.19.1.254 dev eth0 table eth0_table The "route" command has no entries. I can successfully ping using "ping -I" nmap fails, even with the -e option.Run Nmap with the -d option and send the exact error output. Also send the output of nmap --iflist route -n cat /proc/net/route You may obscure any identifying information if you wish. Nmap uses /proc/net/route if available so we'll have to see if that file agress with the rest of your configuration. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 18)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 18)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems kx (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 18)