Re: proxy patch

[Z P <panczelz () gmail com>]

Hi!

Yes, of course :)
If you want use one proxy:
./nmap --socks4 1.1.1.1:1080 <target>
./nmap --socks5 1.1.1.1:1081 <target>
./nmap --http-proxy 1.1.1.1:8080 <target>

if you want use more than one proxy
./nmap --socks4 1.1.1.1:1080,1.1.1.2:1080,1.1.1.3:1080 <target>
./nmap --socks5 1.1.1.1:1081,1.1.1.2:1081,1.1.1.3:1081 <target>
./nmap --http-proxy 1.1.1.1:8080,1.1.1.2:8080,1.1.1.3:8080 <target>

And if you want use more than one proxy type

./nmap --socks5 1.1.1.1:1080 --socks4 1.1.1.2:1081 --http-proxy
1.1.1.3:8080 <target>
./nmap --socks5 1.1.1.1:1080 --http-proxy 1.1.1.3:8080 <target>
...and so on any mix...

With the verbose parameter you can get more information about the
connection procedure.
Please download the last patch from the webpage, because i have
corrected some bugs :)

Thank you for the test :)

Zoltan Panczel

2009/2/17 David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:45:50PM +0100, Z P wrote:
> > I have been writing a brand new proxy patch for nmap.
> > Please test it and report the problems and any other comments.
> >
> > Here is the patch and some information about the patch:
> > http://nmap-dev.fw.hu
>
> I have had a quick look at the patch. I like that it is fairly compact.
> Can you write back with example usage? Send a command line for a simple
> example of scanning through one proxy, and then another example with
> chaining.
>
> Is there a way to make a proxy chain with proxies of different types?
>
> David Fifield

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org