Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [nmap-svn] r11551 - ncat (SO_DEBUG)
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:51:35 -0800
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:13:58PM -0600, Kris Katterjohn wrote:
Since this was of course a reasonable request and nobody has come forth yet, I'll remove the option from Ncat (probably) tomorrow assuming nothing changes.
Sounds good.
Also, since you weren't explicit either way, may I suggest keeping the Nsock functionality there so that Ncat or any other Nsock-utilizing program to come about can use it if desired? Or should it go too until the need arises?
My suggestion is to remove it from the current revision. The beauty of SVN (and mailing list archiving) is that the sort of people who would be competent enough to find the function burried in the source code in the first place can easily retrieve it from svn and put it back later if desired. That way people don't have to download and compile unused code, and we don't have to maintain it. You could always leave a comment about SO_DEBUG where the function was so people know where to get it if desired. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: [nmap-svn] r11551 - ncat (SO_DEBUG) David Fifield (Jan 02)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r11551 - ncat (SO_DEBUG) Kris Katterjohn (Jan 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [nmap-svn] r11551 - ncat (SO_DEBUG) Fyodor (Jan 04)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r11551 - ncat (SO_DEBUG) Kris Katterjohn (Jan 06)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r11551 - ncat (SO_DEBUG) Fyodor (Jan 06)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r11551 - ncat (SO_DEBUG) Kris Katterjohn (Jan 06)