Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Stupid patch... autostat every x seconds
From: Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <buanzo () buanzo com ar>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:52:07 -0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 David Fifield wrote:
What do you all think? What's your opinion of the option name?
- --stats-rate sounds more technical, IMHO. - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman / Arturo Busleiman @ 4:900/107 Independent Linux and Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG - OWASP http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html Mailing List Archives at http://archiver.mailfighter.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJmqTmAlpOsGhXcE0RCugiAJwJCdncd+hoDhBL6mVNZTywIUbyxwCdFGEd Ug0YIAHzlIxhtS3OYQNPj3E= =GI6F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Stupid patch... autostat every x seconds Aleksandar Petrinic (Jan 06)
- Re: Stupid patch... autostat every x seconds David Fifield (Jan 25)
- Re: Stupid patch... autostat every x seconds David Fifield (Feb 16)
- Re: Stupid patch... autostat every x seconds Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Feb 17)
- Re: Stupid patch... autostat every x seconds David Fifield (Feb 17)
- Message not available
- Re: Stupid patch... autostat every x seconds Aleksandar Petrinic (Feb 19)
- Re: Stupid patch... autostat every x seconds Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Feb 17)
- Re: Stupid patch... autostat every x seconds David Fifield (Feb 23)