Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance?
From: "Rob Nicholls" <robert () everythingeverything co uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:44:09 -0000 (UTC)
My complaints are about long time for UDP scan for large networks.
Do you mean "significantly longer than expected" (e.g. a lot more than 18 hours to scan all UDP ports on a host), or just "it took a long time"? I'm assuming the former, as UDP scans will often take a long time when you're scanning hosts that "took RFC 1812 section 4.3.2.8 to heart and limit ICMP error message rate" (to quote an old Nmap page). Linux and Solaris based hosts will typically take a long time to UDP scan when using default (no -T options specified) Nmap settings. Rob _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance?, (continued)
- Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? DePriest, Jason R. (Dec 01)
- Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? Brandon Enright (Dec 02)
- Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? [SCAN BUDDIES] Brandon Enright (Dec 02)
- Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? [SCAN BUDDIES] David Fifield (Dec 02)
- Re: [CAPS] Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? [SCAN BUDDIES] Brandon Enright (Dec 02)
- Re: [CAPS] Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? [SCAN BUDDIES] David Fifield (Dec 02)
- Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? [SCAN BUDDIES] Brandon Enright (Dec 02)
- Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? [SCAN BUDDIES] Brandon Enright (Dec 02)
- Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? [FASTER IS SLOWER] David Fifield (Dec 02)
- Re: Desired improvements in Nmap performance? sara fink (Dec 01)