Re: [SINGLEWORD] radialnet

["sara fink" <sara.fink () gmail com>]

Can you give us results of your scan?

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Luis A. Bastiao Silva
<luis.kop () gmail com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:30 PM, sara fink <sara.fink () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > So, in this case if OS fingerprinting finds various options, with various
> > percentages, I won't know exactly what's going on there.
>
>
> Yeah, I was see it few days ago. Probably the OS match with higher
> accuracy.
> But I think that we don't know exactly what host is running.
>
> Btw frequently accuracy is higher values (as I see in my XML scans).
> So probably (with 90% sure running os Y) and probably (with 91% sure
> running os Z ).
> Why it happens?
> Weird. Am I thinking right?
>
>
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:18 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 05:02:37PM +0300, sara fink wrote:
> > > > Thank you. I already installed nmap 4.76. Will check it.
> > > >
> > > > I wanted to ask about the algorithm/how switch/router/firewall  is
> > > detected
> > > > in zenmap topology. Is it via the OS fingerprinting that nmap does or
> > > other
> > > > way?
> > >
> > > Yes, it's based on the value of the "type" attribute in the XML. It
> > > looks for "router", "switch", "wap", and "firewall" (without regard to
> > > case).
> > >
> > > David Fifield
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> > > http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> > > Archived at http://SecLists.Org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> > http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> > Archived at http://SecLists.Org
>
>
> Best Regards,
> --
> Luis A. Bastiao Silva

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org