Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: How is whois.nse coming along?
From: jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:45:43 +0100
On 30/06/2008 05:06, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
I haven't merged any of my nse_main changes with the main branch. Threads should still have an undefined execution order in my branch, is that where you are testing. I get the impression that "merge of Patrick's branch" implies you are testing in /nmap?
Yes, I was talking about the behaviour of threads in /nmap (rather than in your branch) after the commit (r8377) you mentioned in [1] - which, as you rightly say, wasn't a merge at all! I did much of the mutex stuff for whois.nse in your branch (I think I'd checked-out r8260) where I noticed and subsequently worked around the undefined thread execution order. Whilst the workaround isn't currently necessary under /nmap, I'm glad I was able to add it because the ordered presentation of results of whois.nse was, until then, entirely dependent on ordered thread execution and I'd not considered what would happen if that behaviour changed. Cheers, jah [1] - http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2008/q2/0796.html _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: How is whois.nse coming along? jah (Jul 01)