Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization

[Tom Sellers <nmap () fadedcode net>]

Kris Katterjohn wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> jah wrote:
> > > I initially thought that the "discovery" category should be dropped. 
> > > Is there
> > > an NSE script which isn't really discovering something?  But Brandon
> > > pointed
> > > out that it could just be renamed, and that the name could convey
> > > something
> > > along the lines of "extra information".  I can't really think of a
> > > good name
> > > for it, however.
> > Perhaps "Informational"?
>
> That, too, seems a bit to broad and (for lack of a better word) obvious for
> me.  All NSE scripts are "informational" and are "discovering" something.

What about a labels like Advanced, Enhanced, Complex or Expanded to indicate
that they are still discovery in nature but tasked with handling situations
where heavy lifting is required?

Tom

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org