Re: STOMP Probe

[Lionel Cons <lionel.cons () cern ch>]

doug () hcsw org writes:
> Thanks for this probe. I checked it into SVN with one
> minor change: I put a rarity value of 8 instead of 7.

Thanks.

> Maybe a good guideline should be that probes don't run
> in the default scan unless we expect them to match more
> than one application?

I would disagree with this. IMHO, it should be linked to the probability
of finding the service during a scan. Popular services should be scanned
by default, regardless of the fact that they may need a dedicated probe.

Cheers,

Lionel

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org