Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels

[Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>]

Thomas Buchanan wrote:
> > Kris Katterjohn writes:
> >  > What about something general like this:
> >  > 
> >  > <linkedwith>
> >  > <library name="openssl" version="[version]" />
> >  > <library name="libpcap" version="[version]" />
> >  > <library name="libpcre" version="[version]" />
> >  > <!-- etc -->
> >  > </linkedwith>
> >
> > Fine by me.
> >
> > Lionel
>
> How does the attached patch (against SVN r6441) look?  It prints the
> library versions for libpcap, libpcre, liblua (if included) and openssl
> (if included).
>
> Some questions that I had:
>
> 1.  Where should the output go in the XML file?  I put it right after
> the verbosity / debugging information.

That seems fine to me, because there's not really a great place for it 
to go :)

> 2.  What level of verbosity / debugging should be required to include
> this information?  The patch reflects my opinion that it should be
> included at debugging >=1.

AFAIK, in general, things are printed in the XML output independent of 
whether verbosity/debugging is enabled (unlike normal output which is 
completely controlled by this).

> Thomas

Thanks,
Kris Katterjohn

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org