Re: Lua bugfixes and a new buffering feature

[majek04 <majek04 () gmail com>]

On 7/4/07, Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
> > I'll take a look at it - maybe there is an easy way to replace
> > receive_lines with your buffer-approach, which seems more flexible anyway.
>
> That could be.  It might even be best to add the feature to nsock
> itself.  Or maybe you'll find it more convenient/performant to add it
> at another layer.

Well. Actually I proposed this approach some time ago:
http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2006/q4/0127.html

My patch implemented nsock buffering in next layer, after nsock.

Cheers!
Marek Majkowski

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org