Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: massping-migration and other dev testing results


From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:25:07 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:37:04 -0600
David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:

Weird, there should be many more host groups than that. At least
180000 / 4096 ~= 44, instead of only 6. Did you run these scans with
enlarged ping groups?

That's a darn good point.  I did a 'svn update' but it looks like for some
reason SVN isn't replacing my hacked nmap.h with the ping_group of 65535
back to 4096.  I've changed it back to 4096 manually and I'm running the
tests again.

I should have noticed the small number of ping_groups.  Sorry.

Brandon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG60KDqaGPzAsl94IRAmsPAKCk//bDnUnRSuUWt+Yn44BiCzu7pgCcCOBY
r8608O/60gOdXPU07dKEbo8=
=5slB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org


Current thread: