Re: nmap-4.22SOC5 traceroute problem

["Eddie Bell" <ejlbell () gmail com>]

On 23/08/07, Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
> Thanks for the update, Eddie.  If we don't have any
> information on a hop, maybe we should omit it from the XML.

I've changed it but it will make determining time outs a little
trickier. Umitmapper and nmap.xsl will have to take into account
breaks in the sequence of ttls instead of just checking if a hop has
an 'ipaddr' attribute

> On 8/22/07, Luís A. Bastião Silva <luis.kop () gmail com> wrote:
....
> <hop rtt="" ipaddr="" ttl="13"/>
> <hop rtt="" ipaddr="" ttl="14"/>

This definitely should not happen! Luís you say this occurs on
windows? I tried it on linux and it works fine, I'll give it a test on
windows when I get the chance

cheers
 - eddie

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org