Re: Penis picture is now a DMCA violation!

[Jonathan Smith <smithj () rpath com>]

DePriest, Jason R. wrote
> You missed what I thought was the most obvious interpretation.  The
> picture is of his own penis and he is a minor.  I doubt you can be
> considered a child pornographer if you are, in fact, a child.

You guys are screwing up my bayesian spam filters. I keep marking this 
thread as not spam, but now spamassassin is getting confused...

:-/

-smithj

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org