Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: 4.03 "write buffer not large enough" and "-q (quiet)"
From: Martin Mačok <martin.macok () underground cz>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 07:23:18 +0200
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:18:26AM +0000, Brandon Enright wrote:
I'd like the option of not printing any port state with a frequency higher than say, 1024. Something like this -- (The 65531 ports scanned but not shown below are in states: closed or filtered) ... short list of open ports ...
If you know in advance that there will be many filtered and closed ports too and you are interested in open ports only, you could try http://Xtrmntr.org/ORBman/tmp/nmap/nmap-4.03-defeat_ratelimits.patch and use --defeat-rst-ratelimit option. I know it is not exactly what you want, and the feature you are talking about *does* make sence - especially when you are scanning for many TCP and UDP ports in one run which very often results in two different frequently occuring states (one for TCP and one for UDP). Martin Mačok ICT Security Consultant _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- 4.03 "write buffer not large enough" and "-q (quiet)" Brandon Enright (May 14)
- Re: 4.03 "write buffer not large enough" and "-q (quiet)" Martin Mačok (May 14)
- Re: 4.03 "write buffer not large enough" and "-q (quiet)" Fyodor (May 14)
- [PATCH] Re: 4.03 "write buffer not large enough" and "-q (quiet)" Brandon Enright (May 20)