Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: max-scan-delay not honored?
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:44:29 -0800
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 07:38:25PM +0100, Filippo Solinas wrote:
Hi *, having spent some time playing with the timing & performance options in Nmap 4.01, I then realized that --max-scan-delay seems not work as expected. Or maybe I'm missing something. In the following example, max-scan-delay is set to 100 ms, but it's never honored, as the delta between probes can put in evidence: -x- # nmap -P0 -sS -vv --packet-trace -p 0-4,80,81-85 -r --max-parallelism 1 --max-scan-delay 100 --max-retries 0 X.Y.Z.100
Here you have told Nmap to send only one probe at a time (--max-scan-delay 100). So it needs to wait for each to finish before it starts the next one. Otherwise it would be violating your parallelism restriction (the way Nmap interprets --max-parallelism). So if you want it to scan faster, you need to decrease the max round-trip-time (so Nmap doesn't wait as long to finish each probe) or increase the number of probes allowed in parallel. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- max-scan-delay not honored? Filippo Solinas (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Fyodor (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Fyodor (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Filippo Solinas (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Fyodor (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Filippo Solinas (Mar 11)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Fyodor (Mar 10)