Re: DragonFly patches

[Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 11:43:12PM +0100, joerg () britannica bec de wrote:
> Hi all,
> attached are some patches from pkgsrc.
> patch-ai: recognize DragonFly and NetBSD as OS names in nmapfe.
> patch-ah, patch-af, patch-ad, patch-ab: threat DragonFly like FreeBSD.
>   A finer separation might be useful in the future, but the status quo
>   doesn't make this necessary.
> patch-ad continued: always link against libcrypto when testing for
> libssl, it is needed on many platforms.
>
> Independent of that, please remove the check in libdnet's configure for
> /dev/bpf* to decide whether BPF works, it is very annoying that such
> devices have to created (or even faked) in a build environment for BPF
> support to get compiled in.

Thanks, I have applied your "*-dragonfly*" changes for the next
version (except that I patched the configure.ac files rather than the
generated configure).  I'm not sure what exactly is needed for the
-lcrypto change.  If you send me a patch to nbase/configure.ac which
resolves the issue on dragonflybsd without breaking other platforms,
I'd be happy to apply it.

I haven't heard of the /dev/bpf problem you mention.  If you send a
working patch (again, which doesn't adversely affect other platforms),
or convince Dug Song to release a new libdnet with your patch, I'd be
happy to apply it.

Thanks,
Fyodor


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev