Re: Flushing output

[magnus () linuxtag org (Nils Magnus)]

Re,

On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:06:32PM +0000, grutz wrote:
> Here's something I'd like to see added that would help with rate-limited 
> testing: really flushing out all the information nmap currently has 
> about a host when interrupted with a SIGINT. It sucks to have been 
> scanning 65535 ports on a subnet of 4 machines, have 3 of them be 
> completed while one just sort of sits there, slowly responding. If you 
> send nmap a SIGINT (^C) while it's hung on the last machine you don't 
> get any information in the output other than the scan info. Now you have 
> to rescan the previous hosts again.

That's why I suggested some time ago to introduce a handler for SIGUSR1
or something that makes nmap flush all data on a current host (or set of
target hosts) and move on to the next one.

Regards,

Nils Magnus
Program-Chair LinuxTag 2005 Free Conference Program

LinuxTag 2005: Where .com meets .org - magnus () linuxtag org


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev