Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages
From: mgrd <subscriptions () gerdau freeshell org>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 21:54:58 +0100
sorry for the very long delay .. I was disconnected from the Internet for a while.
Yes, the decoy IP addresses were from the same subnet. This might explain it.
Craig Humphrey wrote:
The decoy IP addresses you used, where they of the same subnet as either of the scanner/target? If they were from the same subnet as the target, it's quite possible that the ISP of the scanner, wont route them.-----Original Message-----From: mgrd [mailto:subscriptions () gerdau freeshell org] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 1:15 PMTo: nmap-dev () insecure org Subject: Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages Hmm, hard to say except: - both systems have public/official IP addresses - using different providers (target: dsl ; source: analog-dialup) I think I'll run the same on a local network on the same segment.---------------------------------------------------------------------For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Current thread:
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Jan 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Jan 03)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages Martin Mačok (Jan 03)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Jan 04)