Re[2]: 3.59ALPHA1: Core port scanner rewrite!

[Bo Cato <jcato73 () comcast net>]

3.70 has a nice ring to it.

-b

F> On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 07:23:15PM -0700, Stou Sandalski wrote:
> > I hope this doesn't start a flame-war but considering you've
> > re-written such large portions of the thing, wouldn't a major version
> > increment be waranted (i.e. nmap 4.0a1)

F> At the rate I've been pumping out (alpha) releases, it seems like I'd
F> be well past 4.0 before the public release :).  Actually I want to
F> write a 2nd generation OS detection system and make many other
F> improvements before calling it 4.0.  But I agree that the version
F> number should be bumped.  If I call it 3.59, some uninformed people
F> probably wouldn't upgrade from 3.55 just because they are so close.
F> I'm currently favoring 3.70.

F> Cheers,
F> Fyodor

F> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
F> For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
F> nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org