Nmap Announce mailing list archives
RE: article 2
From: "Bill Royds" <broyds () home com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 19:41:53 -0400
""without Right" is legal jargon to mean without a pre-existing arrangement, either ownership, licenses, or invitation (including advertising). Now the problem is to decide whether a right had been granted. But a denial (standard disclaimer on MOTD or logon) removes right. -----Original Message----- From: Robert E. Leever [mailto:bel1 () osi com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 18:31 To: nmap-hackers () insecure org Subject: article 2 I'd sure like to know what they mean when they say in article 2: "...when committed intentionally (6) the access to the whole or any part of a computer system without right." by the word "right". No where in the document do the clearly describe what they mean by "without right". If I ping another system on the net have I accessed it? yes. Was it "without right"? If you don't want your systems pinged, then I guess you could decide it was "without right". What if i fat fingered the ip address & pinged the wrong system? If you follow the reference (6) it covers just about everything, including fat fingers. one other "question". Who elected these people anyway? b;) ps. I think I just might be able to slip by article 10 as I understand that you may copy small portions of copyrighted material.... (c: -------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-hackers) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-hackers-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Current thread:
- article 2 Robert E. Leever (Jun 02)
- RE: article 2 Bill Royds (Jun 02)
- Re: article 2 Raul Miller (Jun 03)
- RE: article 2 Bill Royds (Jun 02)