Nmap Announce mailing list archives

Re: Linux 2.0.36 detected as 2.0.35


From: Peter van Dijk <peter () attic vuurwerk nl>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 22:25:41 +0100

On Wed, Dec 16, 1998 at 02:29:20PM -0600, Mario Camou wrote:
Hi,

Just to say, Linux running kernel 2.0.36 is erroneously detected as 2.0.35,
here's the fingerprint for 2.0.36:

Remote operating system guess: Linux 2.0.35
OS Fingerprint:
T1(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=7FE0%ACK=S++%Flags=AS%Ops=ME)
T2(Resp=N)
T3(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=7FE0%ACK=S++%Flags=ASF%Ops=ME)
T4(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=O%Flags=R%Ops=)
T5(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S++%Flags=AR%Ops=)
T6(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=O%Flags=R%Ops=)
T7(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S%Flags=AR%Ops=)
PU(Resp=Y%DF=N%TOS=C0%IPLEN=164%RIPTL=148%RID=E%RIPCK=E%UCK=E%ULEN=134%DAT=E)

Here's the fingerprint for a 2.0.35 box:

Remote operating system guess: Linux 2.0.35
OS Fingerprint:
TSeq(Class=TR)
T1(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=7FE0%ACK=S++%Flags=AS%Ops=ME)
T2(Resp=N)
T3(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=7FE0%ACK=S++%Flags=ASF%Ops=ME)
T4(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=O%Flags=R%Ops=)
T5(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S++%Flags=AR%Ops=)
T6(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=O%Flags=R%Ops=)
T7(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S%Flags=AR%Ops=)
PU(Resp=Y%DF=N%TOS=C0%IPLEN=164%RIPTL=148%RID=E%RIPCK=E%UCK=E%ULEN=134%DAT=E)

They look the same! What to do then?

They are the same. From what I see here (I have a .35 and .36 which both give
this fingerprint) you can't tell the difference.

Another point: I found that running nmap -O thru a masquerading firewall is
not really reliable :(

Greetz, Peter.
-- 
'I guess anybody who walks away from a root shell at :         Peter van Dijk
 a nerd party gets what they deserve!' -- BillSF     :peter () attic vuurwerk nl
-- --   -- --   -- --   -- --   -- --   -- --   -- --   -- --   -- --   -- --
finger hardbeat () flits104-161 flits rug nl for my public PGP-key
  -  ---  -  ---  -  ---  -  ---  -  ---  -  ---  -  ---  -  ---  -  ---  -


Current thread: