nanog mailing list archives

Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR


From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:10:57 -0800

For many years, a large customer (telco/VOIP/ISP carrier that should have known better) of a former employer was using 
11.0.0.0/8 as an extension of 10.0.0.0/8 and literally forced said employer to carry their routes to those prefixes in 
those tables (or lose an extremely lucrative contract). At the time, 11/8 was IANA resrved, and my point that it was 
likely to be allocated to an RIR and subsequently some real entitie(s) on the internet was utterly lost in the pursuit 
of the almighty dollar. I left that job for greener pastures before IANA allocated that prefix, but I’m sure there were 
some definite interesting results there when it happened.

Owen


On Jan 31, 2024, at 14:45, Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:

Even though it is very risky to steal resources from an organization
that can deploy a black helicopter or a nuclear warhead over you

Seems a bit dramatic. Companies all over the world have been using other people's public IPs internally for decades. 
I worked at a place 20 odd years ago that had an odd numbering scheme internally, and it was someone else's public 
space. When I asked why, the guy who built it said "Well I just liked the pattern." 

If you're not announcing someone else's space into the DFZ, or otherwise trying to do anything shady, the three 
letter agencies aren't likely to come knocking. Doesn't mean anyone SHOULD be doing it, but still.  

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:49 AM Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com <mailto:rubensk () gmail com>> wrote:
DoD's /8s are usually squatted by networks that run out of private IPv4 space.
Even though it is very risky to steal resources from an organization
that can deploy a black helicopter or a nuclear warhead over you, for
some reason like it not appearing in the DFZ people seem to like it.


Rubens

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:40 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com <mailto:dave.taht () gmail com>> wrote:

That's pretty cool, actually. I keep wondering when someone will offer
up a 0.0.0.0/8. <http://0.0.0.0/8.>..

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-0-00.html

There must be more people out there than just amazon and google that
ran out of 10/8.

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:29 AM Frank Habicht <geier () geier ne tz <mailto:geier () geier ne tz>> wrote:

Hi,

I got 2 bounces for the email addresses seen below for an email similar
to the below...

Anyone want to remove this IRR entry before anyone notices...???   ;-)

Frank


I believe that the entry of
route:          0.0.0.0/32 <http://0.0.0.0/32>

does not serve any good purpose?

I was surprised to see it in a list of prefixes from bgpq4 and the very
good https://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/prefix/0.0.0.0 guided me that it's in
"Level3".

I'm wondering how many auto-generated filters contain this unnecessary
prefix....

PS: Oh, just seen - it's from TODAY. Maybe remove before anyone sees it...?

Thanks for looking into this,
Frank


[frank@fisi ~]$ whois -h rr.level3.com <http://rr.level3.com/> 0.0.0.0/32 <http://0.0.0.0/32>
[Querying rr.level3.com <http://rr.level3.com/>]
[rr.level3.com <http://rr.level3.com/>]
route:          0.0.0.0/32 <http://0.0.0.0/32>
origin:         AS10753
mnt-by:         TCCGlobalNV-MNT
changed:        ankita.grewal () lumen com <mailto:ankita.grewal () lumen com>
source:         LEVEL3
last-modified:  2024-01-30T11:04:49Z


[frank@fisi ~]$ whois -h rr.level3.com <http://rr.level3.com/> TCCGlobalNV-MNT
[Querying rr.level3.com <http://rr.level3.com/>]
[rr.level3.com <http://rr.level3.com/>]
mntner:         TCCGlobalNV-MNT
descr:          TCC Global N.V.
auth:           CRYPT-PW DummyValue  # Filtered for security
upd-to:         ripehostmaster () eu centurylink net <mailto:ripehostmaster () eu centurylink net>
tech-c:         LTHM
admin-c:        LTHM
mnt-by:         TCCGlobalNV-MNT
changed:        ankita.grewal () lumen com <mailto:ankita.grewal () lumen com>
source:         LEVEL3
last-modified:  2024-01-30T11:01:52Z



--
40 years of net history, a couple songs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos


Current thread: