Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block

["Abraham Y. Chen" <aychen () avinta com>]

Hi, Owen:

1)    "  ...  IPv4 used to work before NAT made everything horrible.  ":

    Utilizing 240/4, RAN is a flat space which should support this kind 
of rudimentary end-to-end connectivity within each RAN. (called L2 
routing, correct?)

Regards,


Abe (2024-01-20 10:35)


On 2024-01-19 04:02, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Any host connected to a reasonably well peered ISP (e.g. NOT Cogent) 
> with IPv6 should be able to communicate with any other such host so 
> long as the administrative policies on both sides permit it.
>
> I have no difficulty directly reaching a variety of IPv6 hosts from 
> the /48 in my home.
>
> However, it’s not like dial-up modem operations in the PSTN in that IP 
> is an inherently connectionless packet switched service while modems 
> were an inherently circuit switched connection oriented service.
>
> However, it does work like IPv4 used to work before NAT made 
> everything horrible.
>
> Owen
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 2024, at 12:20, Abraham Y. Chen <aychen () avinta com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Forrest:
> >
> > 1)    I have a question:
> >
> >     If I subscribe to IPv6, can I contact another similar subscriber 
> > to communicate (voice and data) directly between two homes in private 
> > like the dial-up modem operations in the PSTN? If so, is it available 
> > anywhere right now?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Abe (2024-01-15 15:20)
> >
> >
> > 	om 
> > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
> >
> >
> > <x-msg://12/#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com