nanog mailing list archives

Re: Any info on AT&T Wireless Outage?


From: Ryan Wilkins via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:54:36 -0500

No $5 received here.. Just a text message saying, "It's AT&T. We apologize for Thursday's outage, which may have 
impacted you. As a valued customer, your connection matters and we are committed to doing better.” 

I had the thought the other day that maybe this was a hack and that they didn’t want to admit such.  I’m sure FirstNet 
being taken over by hackers isn’t exactly the message they want out there.  Regardless of what the actual cause was, 
their lack of communicating anything meaningful is saying something which boosts the chances that this was a hack in my 
mind.

Agreed on the human error thing, but maybe the human error was something the hackers did that they didn’t mean to.


On Feb 29, 2024, at 2:55 PM, Javier J <javier () advancedmachines us> wrote:

Where did you see this? Erik Prince was on the PBD podcast saying he has a 70% chance in his head it was China. I 
tend to learn towards human error from my experience in the IT biz.

- J

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:58 AM <joel () joelesler net <mailto:joel () joelesler net>> wrote:
I read it as “someone pushed an ACL that wasn’t properly reviewed and it really screwed things up."

On Feb 27, 2024, at 21:41, Mark Seiden <mis () seiden com <mailto:mis () seiden com>> wrote:

aside from the official pablum that was released about an “incorrect process used”
(which says exactly nothing) does anyone actually know anything accurate and 
more specific about the root cause?

(and why it took 11 hours to recover?)

On Feb 22, 2024, at 11:15 AM, John Councilman <jcouncilman () gmail com <mailto:jcouncilman () gmail com>> wrote:

From what I've read, they lost their database of SIM cards.  I could be wrong of course.

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:02 PM Dorn Hetzel <dorn () hetzel org <mailto:dorn () hetzel org>> wrote:
As widespread as it seemed to be, it feels like it would be quite a trick if it were a single piece of hardware.  
Firmware load that ended badly, I wonder?


On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 1:51 PM Leato, Gary via NANOG <nanog () nanog org <mailto:nanog () nanog org>> wrote:
Do you have the ability to expand on this at all? Do you mean a hardware failure of some kind IE router, 
optitcs, etc?

 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+gleato=advance-trading.com () nanog org <mailto:advance-trading.com () nanog org>> On 
Behalf Of R. Leigh Hennig
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 8:17 AM
To: Robert DeVita <radevita () mejeticks com <mailto:radevita () mejeticks com>>
Cc: nanog () nanog org <mailto:nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Any info on AT&T Wireless Outage?

 

Word around the campfire is that it’s a Cisco issue.




On Feb 22, 2024, at 8:03 AM, Robert DeVita <radevita () mejeticks com <mailto:radevita () mejeticks com>> wrote:

 

Reports have it starting at 4:30 a.m.. SOS on all phones..

 

 

 



Robert DeVita​​​​

CEO and Founder

t: (469) 581-2160 <tel:(469)%20581-2160> 
 | 

m: (469) 441-8864 <tel:(469)%20441-8864>
e: radevita () mejeticks com <mailto:radevita () mejeticks com>  
 | 

w: mejeticks.com <https://www.mejeticks.com/>
a: 

2323 N Akard Street

, 

Dallas

, 

75201

 <https://www.linkedin.com/company/mejeticks/>   
 <https://twitter.com/mejeticks> 
 <https://www.facebook.com/mejeticks>    
 <https://linktr.ee/mejeticks>
 



The risk of trading futures and options can be substantial. All information, publications, and material used and 
distributed by Advance Trading Inc. shall be construed as a solicitation. ATI does not maintain an independent 
research department as defined in CFTC Regulation 1.71. Information obtained from third-party sources is 
believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed by Advance Trading Inc. Past performance is not 
necessarily indicative of future results.




Current thread: