Re: Verizon Business Contact

[sronan () ronan-online com]

Based on the ASName of both AS, including CELLCO which is the actual name of the corporate entity known as Verizon 
Wireless, I would agree that both are in fact Verizon Wireless. The contacts are just corporate standard entities.

Shane

> On Feb 19, 2024, at 9:01 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager () wiktel com> wrote:
>
> I see the route originated by two different ASNs. I agree that when I use the AS6167 path, it is broken (for the 
> destinations where it is broken; 63.59.166.100 was working despite using the AS6167 path).
>
> BGP routing table entry for 63.59.0.0/16
> Paths: 2 available
>  6939 701 22394
>    184.105.34.254 from 184.105.34.254 (216.218.253.228)
>      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 60, IGP metric 0, weight 0, tag 0
>      Received 21d19h ago, valid, external, best
>      Rx SAFI: Unicast
>  6461 701 6167
>    69.89.205.202 from 69.89.205.202 (69.89.205.202)
>      Origin IGP, metric 887, localpref 60, IGP metric 40, weight 0, tag 0
>      Received 4d03h ago, valid, internal
>      Community: 6461:5997
>      Rx SAFI: Unicast
>
> Based on the names in WHOIS, I would say that both AS6167 and AS22394 are Verizon Wireless.
>
> --
> Richard