nanog mailing list archives

Re: ru tld down?

From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:17:14 +0200

Peace,

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 6:39 am Mark Andrews, <marka () isc org> wrote:

Given “MUST NOT” is not in RFC 4034, Appendix B, I’d take this with a grain
of salt.


"Implementations MUST NOT assume that the key tag uniquely identifies a
DNSKEY RR."

--
Töma

Current thread:

Re: ru tld down? Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 07)
- Re: ru tld down? Mark Andrews (Feb 07)
  - Re: ru tld down? Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 07)
    - Re: ru tld down? Mark Andrews (Feb 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ru tld down? darkdevil (Feb 08)
  - Re: ru tld down? Bjørn Mork (Feb 08)
  - Re: ru tld down? Mark Andrews (Feb 08)
    - Re: ru tld down? Gaurav Kansal via NANOG (Feb 09)
    - Re: ru tld down? Randy Bush (Feb 09)