nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 05:27:40 -0700
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 12:13 AM Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
William Herrin wrote:That sounds like normal TCP behavior over a long fat pipe.No, not at all. First, though you explain slow start, it has nothing to do with long fat pipe. Long fat pipe problem is addressed by window scaling (and SACK).
So, I've actually studied this in real-world conditions and TCP behaves exactly as I described in my previous email for exactly the reasons I explained. If you think it doesn't, you don't know what you're talking about. Window scaling and SACK makes it possible for TCP to grow to consume the entire whole end-to-end pipe when the pipe is at least as large as the originating interface and -empty- of other traffic. Those conditions are rarely found in the real world. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?, (continued)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Lukas Tribus (Sep 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 01)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 01)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 01)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 01)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 04)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? William Herrin (Sep 04)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 04)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? William Herrin (Sep 04)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 04)