nanog mailing list archives

Re: FW: softlayer.com


From: Zach Hanna <Zachary.Hanna () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 23:00:12 -0500

I think AT&T is involved now. If you still need something I can ask around.

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 2:16 PM John Alcock <john () alcock org> wrote:

Well,

It has been a challenge.  I am not sure who helped or fixed the problem,
but now anything hosted on softlayer.com is responding.

I am not sure if there was anyone lurking on the list that helped out, but
if you are, Thank You.

I have a batch of new stuff not working, but they may be one off's.  I am
trying to find a pattern.

John

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:32 PM Travis Garrison <tgarrison () netviscom com>
wrote:

Traceroute from here if it helps



Tracing route to 138-43-128-1.reserved.highland.net [138.43.128.1]

over a maximum of 30 hops:



  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  [REDACTED]

  2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  [REDACTED]

  3     1 ms     1 ms    <1 ms  [REDACTED]

  4     1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  [REDACTED]

  5     6 ms     6 ms     6 ms  v313.core1.mci3.he.net [216.218.213.141]

  6    16 ms    16 ms    16 ms  100ge10-2.core1.dal1.he.net
[184.105.81.206]

  7    26 ms    26 ms    26 ms
xo-as15-as2828.10gigabitethernet6-7.core1.dal1.he.net [184.105.255.78]

  8    40 ms    39 ms    40 ms  207.88.14.198.ptr.us.xo.net
[207.88.14.198]

  9    40 ms    39 ms    40 ms  207.88.12.178.ptr.us.xo.net
[207.88.12.178]

10    39 ms    39 ms    39 ms  216.156.16.239.ptr.us.xo.net
[216.156.16.239]

11    48 ms    48 ms    48 ms
ip65-46-198-198.z198-46-65.customer.algx.net [65.46.198.198]

12    41 ms    41 ms    41 ms
occm-6.dhcp.grp1-rng1.tncsvl.blomand.net.57.131.192.in-addr.arpa
[192.131.57.6]

13     *        *        *     Request timed out.



Thanks

Travis



*From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> *On Behalf Of *Siyuan Miao
*Sent:* Friday, March 22, 2019 9:22 AM
*To:* Nikolas Geyer <nik () neko id au>
*Cc:* nanog () nanog org
*Subject:* Re: softlayer.com



Perhaps it won't work because their customer support will ask you for
bi-directional traceroute and refused to forward to backbone team.



Then they'll say it's not their fault and you can see the packet is
dropped outside our network.



Here's a sample traceroute from SoftLayer Washington, San Jose and
Seattle in case someone needs it:



aveline@iad02-sl01:~$ mtr 138.43.128.1 --report-wide

Start: Fri Mar 22 17:20:42 2019

HOST: iad02-sl01                                Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg
Best  Wrst StDev

  1.|-- [REDACTED]                                 0.0%    10    1.4
 1.5   0.8   3.7   1.0

  2.|-- ae13.dar02.wdc01.networklayer.com          0.0%    10    0.5
 3.3   0.4  28.6   8.8

  3.|-- ae9.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com      0.0%    10    0.8
 0.8   0.7   1.0   0.0

  4.|-- eqix-dc5.intellifiber.com                  0.0%    10    0.8
 1.2   0.8   2.2   0.3

  5.|-- ae13-0.cr02.asbn01-va.us.windstream.net    0.0%    10    0.9
 0.9   0.9   1.0   0.0

  6.|-- ae11-0.cr01.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net    0.0%    10   15.6
16.1  15.6  17.4   0.5

  7.|-- ae0-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net     0.0%    10   17.4
16.1  15.9  17.4   0.3

  8.|-- h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net     0.0%    10   24.7
24.8  24.6  24.9   0.0

  9.|-- east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net  0.0%    10   22.6
22.8  22.5  23.8   0.0

 10.|-- ???                                       100.0    10    0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0



aveline@sjc03-sl01:~$ mtr 138.43.128.1 --report-wide

Start: Fri Mar 22 16:21:04 2019

HOST: sjc03-sl01                                Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg
Best  Wrst StDev

  1.|-- [REDACTED]                                 0.0%    10    2.4
 2.0   0.3  14.3   4.3

  2.|-- ae0.dar02.sjc01.networklayer.com           0.0%    10    1.0
 0.5   0.3   1.3   0.0

  3.|-- ae9.bbr01.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com      0.0%    10    0.8
 0.8   0.7   0.9   0.0

  4.|-- eqix-sv1.windstream.com                    0.0%    10    0.9
 0.9   0.8   1.1   0.0

  5.|-- ae6-0.cr02.lsaj01-ca.us.windstream.net     0.0%    10   11.6
11.5  11.5  11.6   0.0

  6.|-- ae-11-0.cr01.dlls01-tx.us.windstream.net   0.0%    10   42.6
42.7  42.5  43.4   0.0

  7.|-- ae7-0.cr02.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net     0.0%    10   64.0
65.6  63.9  74.2   3.4

  8.|-- ae1-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net     0.0%    10   62.3
62.7  62.2  66.9   1.5

  9.|-- h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net     0.0%    10   71.9
72.0  71.9  72.2   0.0

 10.|-- east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net  0.0%    10   69.9
68.8  68.6  69.9   0.3

 11.|-- ???                                       100.0    10    0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0



aveline@sea04-sl01:~$ mtr 138.43.128.1 --report-wide

Start: Fri Mar 22 08:19:09 2019

HOST: sea04-sl01                                Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg
Best  Wrst StDev

  1.|-- [REDACTED]                                 0.0%    10    0.7
 1.2   0.7   1.8   0.0

  2.|-- ae12.dar02.sr01.sea01.networklayer.com     0.0%    10    0.6
 0.7   0.5   1.3   0.0

  3.|-- ae9.bbr01.wb01.sea02.networklayer.com      0.0%    10    1.2
 1.0   0.7   1.5   0.0

  4.|-- six.seattle-wa.us.windstream.net           0.0%    10    1.5
 1.0   0.7   1.7   0.0

  5.|-- ae12-0.cr01.chcg01-il.us.windstream.net    0.0%    10   41.1
41.2  41.0  41.6   0.0

  6.|-- ae17-0.cr02.chcg01-il.us.windstream.net    0.0%    10   41.1
41.4  41.1  42.0   0.0

  7.|-- ae10-0.cr01.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net    0.0%    10   63.8
64.4  63.5  71.1   2.3

  8.|-- ae0-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net     0.0%    10   63.7
63.7  63.5  64.0   0.0

  9.|-- h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net     0.0%    10   71.6
71.8  71.5  72.8   0.0

 10.|-- east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net  0.0%    10   71.8
70.8  70.2  71.8   0.3

 11.|-- ???                                       100.0    10    0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0





Regards,

Siyuan Miao





On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:10 PM Nikolas Geyer <nik () neko id au> wrote:

This is the best approach. Have run into this problem a few times and had
zero success getting the filters removed without having SL customers log
tickets with support. Verbiage needs to be “this prefix is blocked, please
escalate to your backbone team”.



Sent from my iPhone


On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:56 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
lists () packetflux com> wrote:

Another idea...



Have you tried reaching out to some of the blocked sites?  They likely
have better contact information than is available publicly, especially a
larger one like indeed.



On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 3:41 PM John Alcock <john () alcock org> wrote:

Still looking for anyone from softlayer.com



It has been a challenge.  Anything hosted by softlayer.com is being
blocked.



Here is a small list so far



windowbook.tpondemand.com
ahainstructornetwork.americanheart.org
clover.com
Cebroker.com
Softlayer.com
indeed.com & Enforce Staffing



It is growing every day.



John



On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:35 PM John Alcock <john () alcock org> wrote:

Afternoon,



Thought I would start a new thread.  After researching, traceroutes, etc,
I think I found my problem.



9 out of the 10 sites that subscribers on my new block is being hosted by
softlayer.



Anyone on the list have contacts with softlayer.  Right now I have an
email to abuse.  The support line will not help me out.



John



Current thread: