RE: MX204 tunnel services BW

[Jeff Behrns via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Delong.com <owen () delong com> 
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 5:47 PM
To: behrnsjeff () yahoo com
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: MX204 tunnel services BW

> “Tunnel gets whatever bandwidth is left after physical port packets are processed” and likely some additional 
> overhead for managing the sharing.

> Could that be what’s happening to you?

Aggregate throughput for the box was less than 100Gbps while the tunnel was being starved.