nanog mailing list archives

Re: Congestion/latency-aware routing for MPLS?


From: Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 07:21:09 -0700

We have been hoping to find use cases for the babel protocol's rtt
metric, which builds on ideas from ntp, and is primarily used today in
overlay networks:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension/


On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 7:17 AM Jason R. Rokeach via NANOG
<nanog () nanog org> wrote:

Hi Adam,
This sounds like a use case for MPLS-TE with TWAMP-Light. TWAMP-Light handles the latency concern and can encode your 
measured latency in IS-IS. Juniper docs: 
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/is-is/topics/topic-map/enable-link-delay-advertise-in-is-is.html.
 The configuration in steps 5 and 7 is all thats required (from a config standpoint) to get the data into IS-IS.
You then, when building an RSVP LSP, would specify a constraint for the latency. Alternatively you can route by 
latency on its own by setting the metric to latency, but as you've alluded to, this can be pretty dangerous in 
environments with mixed bandwidth availability.

The other option afforded for the second point on traffic balance is to use auto-bandwidth 
(https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/mpls/topics/topic-map/basic-lsp-configurtion.html#id-configuring-automatic-bandwidth-allocation-for-lsps
 - see also https://archive.nanog.org/sites/default/files/tues.general.steenbergen.autobandwidth.30.pdf).

Other vendors support this as well.
SR supports the use of TWAMP-Light as well if you prefer that over RSVP, but it doesn't support auto-bandwidth.

_______________________
Jason R. Rokeach
m: 603.969.5549
e: jason () rokea ch
tg: jasonrokeach

Sent with ProtonMail secure email. Get my PGP Public Key.

------- Original Message -------
On Wednesday, October 18th, 2023 at 9:13 AM, Adam Thompson - athompson at merlin.mb.ca 
<athompson_at_merlin_mb_ca_cbbhoxs () simplelogin co> wrote:

Using a mix of Juniper hardware...

Network provides VPLS to customer, over MPLS (obviously) in a dual-redundant-ring radio topology.  Each site is 
connected to one or more neighbors, generally with two radios, in two different bands, to *each* neighbor.  So an 
ordinary node might have 4 radios, 2 pointing in each direction.

Every single radio link has different bandwidth, different latency, and different interference characteristics.

These radio links do run at 100% capacity at least some of the time.

It's possible to set each link's relative cost in OSPF or IS-IS, of course, but I haven't found a way to make the 
router react to latency changes on one link or the other.  (Right now, I think costs are set equal so traffic will 
use both links.)  This means interference in one band invisibly diminishes the Ethernet bandwidth available and 
silently increases the latency on that link, sometimes dramatically.  This seems to do interestingly unpleasant 
things to the client's flows.

It's generally true that one band will be much more severely affected than the other, in any interference event.  
Before anyone asks, I'm told the network is a mixture of licensed and unlicensed bands, that's not changing anytime 
soon.

In a perfect world, I'd like the routers to dynamically adjust traffic balance, but even just temporarily halting use 
of the impaired link would be helpful (or so I believe right now, at least).

Is this a pipe dream?  I'm not seeing anything in JunOS that could accomplish this...  I'm not even sure if a mesh 
protocol could handle dual active links like this?

Ideas, comments, etc. all appreciated.

Also, I'm not the direct operator of use network. I'm involved, but mostly just trying to help them find better 
solutions.  Nor am I an MPLS expert, as is obvious here.

Thanks,
-Adam

Adam Thompson

Consultant, Infrastructure Services

MERLIN

100 - 135 Innovation Drive

Winnipeg, MB R3T 6A8

(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)

https://www.merlin.mb.ca

Chat with me on Teams




-- 
Oct 30: https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos


Current thread: