nanog mailing list archives
Re: constraining RPKI Trust Anchors
From: Joelja Bogus <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:07:36 -0700
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2023, at 15:29, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote: So while each RP should be able to make policy decisions based on its own local criteria, managing a default set of constraints is something that is best done centralized. Who do you envision should manage these lists? RP software maintainers? RIRs? Others?and how will this pain-to-maintain list be distributed? how do i know a copy is authentic not an attack? i am all for a single root of trust. it's just that i thought it was the iana's job. but i am easily confused.
Not clear to me how IANA constrains the behavior of the rirs either now or in the future.
randy
Current thread:
- Re: constraining RPKI Trust Anchors Martin Pels (Oct 11)
- Re: constraining RPKI Trust Anchors Delong.com via NANOG (Oct 11)
- Re: constraining RPKI Trust Anchors Job Snijders via NANOG (Oct 11)
- Re: constraining RPKI Trust Anchors Randy Bush (Oct 11)
- Re: constraining RPKI Trust Anchors Joelja Bogus (Oct 12)