nanog mailing list archives
Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service
From: Richard Holbo <holbor () sonss net>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 14:43:39 -0700
There are LOTS of small business that have .us domains. I've got several that just use these domains as well as locality specific things such as schools or towns that use them rather than the longer ones supplied to municipal entities. /rh On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 1:34 PM goemon--- via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/10/us-harbors-prolific-malicious-link-shortening-service/ "The NTIA recently published a proposal that would allow registrars to redact all registrant data from WHOIS registration records for .US domains. A broad array of industry groups have filed comments opposing the proposed changes, saying they threaten to remove the last vestiges of accountability for a top-level domain that is already overrun with cybercrime activity." What hope is there when registrars are actively aiding and abeting criminal enterprises? Are there any legitimate services running solely on .us domain names? -Dan
Current thread:
- .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service goemon--- via NANOG (Nov 02)
- RE: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Shawn L via NANOG (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service William Herrin (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Allan Liska (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service William Herrin (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service bzs (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Rubens Kuhl (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Allan Liska (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Richard Holbo (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Eric Kuhnke (Nov 02)