nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing?
From: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:00:43 -0700
On 3/9/23 1:39 PM, William Herrin wrote:
I would hope folks are implementing uRPF on commodity broadband connections. That's one place it works great.
I would hope so too. I also would hope that uRPF was enabled by default on SOHO routers. And yet ... I'm routinely disappointed.CADIA has a Spoofer probe project that tests this very thing. I see periodic announcements to various mailing lists about their monthly results. -- I'll find one if you care to know more.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? John Levine (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Aaron1 (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Jon Lewis (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Mark Tinka (Mar 12)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Christopher Munz-Michielin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Christopher Morrow (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Aaron1 (Mar 09)