nanog mailing list archives
Re: Request for comments
From: Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:27:17 +0100
Quick (and critical) correction: bar charts on the ***left*** are from *NOGs; bar charts on the ***right*** are from commissioned market research. Cheers, Etienne On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:06 PM Etienne-Victor Depasquale <edepa () ieee org> wrote:
The picture changes significantly when an operator's choice is weighted by his current subscriber base. Evidently, incumbents have lots of copper media, while smaller operators (more agile?) are laying fibre and mostly growing GPON on it. Rebuttals are welcome ! Unweighted data <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eZZeqbDaTj6nSJJDdK0iu5Xm9Z_691rR&authuser=etienne.depasquale%40um.edu.mt&usp=drive_fs> Weighted data <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fMLiEGbvaD4pqCmQM75HWYoR37XaiHFQ/view?usp=sharing> (weighted by number of subscribers) Cheers, Etienne On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 5:32 PM Etienne-Victor Depasquale <edepa () ieee org> wrote:I've updated the graphic <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eZZeqbDaTj6nSJJDdK0iu5Xm9Z_691rR&authuser=etienne.depasquale%40um.edu.mt&usp=drive_fs> with one other data point and increased the graphic's size (following feedback). In particular, I'd like to understand why there are so many operators who consider Active Ethernet (p2p) to be their largest and/or fastest growing access technology. Would anyone care to give an opinion / interpretation / perspective / other ? Cheers, Etienne On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:24 AM Etienne-Victor Depasquale <edepa () ieee org> wrote:Good people of NANOG, Please find here <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eZZeqbDaTj6nSJJDdK0iu5Xm9Z_691rR/view?usp=sharing> a snapshot of two datasets concerning access technologies in the metro area. The bar chart on the right summarizes data I collected last year from *NOGs; the bar chart on the left summarizes data received last year from Tier 1 and/or regional operators (incumbents). The y-axis shows cumulative responses for an option; the x-axis shows (hopefully unambiguous) monikers for the access technologies. Would anyone care to comment on how well this matches his/her perception of the current state of deployments? Cheers, Etienne -- Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale Assistant Lecturer Department of Communications & Computer Engineering Faculty of Information & Communication Technology University of Malta Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale-- Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale Assistant Lecturer Department of Communications & Computer Engineering Faculty of Information & Communication Technology University of Malta Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale-- Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale Assistant Lecturer Department of Communications & Computer Engineering Faculty of Information & Communication Technology University of Malta Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
-- Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale Assistant Lecturer Department of Communications & Computer Engineering Faculty of Information & Communication Technology University of Malta Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
Current thread:
- Request for comments Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Mar 01)
- Re: Request for comments Brandon Butterworth (Mar 01)
- Re: Request for comments Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Mar 03)
- Re: Request for comments Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Mar 07)
- Re: Request for comments Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Mar 08)
- Re: Request for comments Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Mar 07)