nanog mailing list archives
Re: txt.att.net outage?
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 20 Jan 2023 16:08:29 -0500
It appears that Simmons, Jay via NANOG <jsimmons () semmes-murphey com> said:
-=-=-=-=-=- This may be the issue
Sorry, but no.
Here are some details on this Government protocol implemented by all Telecom Carriers. Why it is being done? To support FCC mandate for STIR/SHAKEN, an industry set of rules designed to authenticate and validate CallerID information associated with phone calls using digital signatures. SHAKEN/STIR ...
STIR/SHAKEN only affects voice calls. It has nothing to do with SMS. As several other people have said, if you're sending safety critical SMS messages, use a real SMS service, not a carrier's courtesy low volume e-mail gateway. SMS services are not free, but they are not expensive, typically about 1/2 cent per message. R's, John
Current thread:
- txt.att.net outage? Dan Walters via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: txt.att.net outage? William Herrin (Jan 20)
- Re: txt.att.net outage? Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: txt.att.net outage? Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: txt.att.net outage? Tim Burke (Jan 20)
- Re: txt.att.net outage? Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: txt.att.net outage? Martin Hannigan (Jan 20)
- Re: txt.att.net outage? William Herrin (Jan 20)
- Re: txt.att.net outage? Tim Burke (Jan 20)
- RE: txt.att.net outage? Simmons, Jay via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: txt.att.net outage? John Levine (Jan 20)
- RE: txt.att.net outage? Simmons, Jay via NANOG (Jan 20)