Re: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment

["Lancheng Qin" <qlc19 () mails tsinghua edu cn>]

Hi,


Although we strictly guarantee the anonymity of participants in this survey and do not disclose their specific 
information, we also allow participants to withdraw their answers.


If you have filled out this questionnaire and do not want your answers to be disclosed, please send an email to qlc19 
() mails tsinghua edu cn. If not, please ignore this email.


Best,
Lancheng


-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Lancheng Qin" <qlc19 () mails tsinghua edu cn>
发送时间:2023-05-23 14:40:14 (星期二)
收件人: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
抄送:
主题: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment


Hello, we have done a worldwide measurement to identify which ASes have propagated RPKI-invalid prefixes. We find an 
interesting phenomenon that some ASes may perform RPKI-invalid filtering only at partial interfaces (e.g., provider 
interfaces, customer interfaces, and peer interfaces). Although there are other studies [1, 2] noting the same 
phenomenon, little is known about why some network operators perform different filtering policies at different 
interfaces.


We are trying to figure out the reasons and summarize the optimal deployment policy for RPKI-invalid filtering. To this 
end, we create an anonymous questionnaire and hope you can help fill out it.


Questionnaire link: 
https://qfreeaccountssjc1.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/preview/previewId/70bbaf01-b4a6-4f7d-aac4-33cff5b135a3/SV_dj62hVBXcEy5ryC?Q_CHL=preview&Q_SurveyVersionID=current


Reference:
[1] Help Validate ROV Adoption Measurements from RoVista. 
https://labs.ripe.net/author/tijay-chung/help-validate-rov-adoption-measurements-from-rovista/
[2] 85% of MANRS Members Conformant to Actions 1 and 4. https://www.manrs.org/2023/01/85-of-manrs-members-conformant/


If you have any questions, concerns, issues, or comments, please send an email to qlc19 () mails tsinghua edu cn


Best,
Lancheng