nanog mailing list archives
Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 08:09:46 +0200
On 8/23/23 08:00, Pascal Masha wrote:
Thanks just wanted to know whether it was a supported feature.
What would have been nice is if Juniper oversubscribed the face plate of this platform, as most people are more likely to run out of ports than they would the 400Gbps forwarding capacity of Trio.
In some cases, we deploy more of these in the same PoP just because we need more ports, not because we need more capacity; and a chassis would not make sense for the function, yet.
Mark.
Current thread:
- MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Pascal Masha (Aug 21)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Ryan Hamel (Aug 21)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 21)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Chris (Aug 22)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Pascal Masha (Aug 22)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 22)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Tom Beecher (Aug 23)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Matt Erculiani (Aug 23)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Tom Beecher (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Aaron1 (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Tom Beecher (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Pascal Masha (Aug 22)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Ryan Hamel (Aug 21)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 23)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup tim () pelican org (Aug 23)