nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR)
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 11:14:24 +0200
On 3/31/23 15:51, Ca By wrote:
We use a lot of 100g-FRFor dense deployment and limited faceplate space, 100g-fr / dr are the only way.LR4 is dead to me.
We run the SR4 optics for in-rack cabling, because they are about 4X cheaper than all the single-mode options.
We have been heavy on the LR4 optics, but are now starting to test (and if happy, switch to) the FR units, as they are even cheaper than the LR4 option.
The DR options don't make much sense for us, because we prefer the SR4 for in-rack cabling, and given how large data centres are nowadays, 500m might not enough to interconnect with customers.
But for un-amplified Metro-E deployments, we are looking forward to testing Adva's 100G-ZR, which is also a single lane optic.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Mark Tinka (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) David Siegel (Apr 02)
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- RE: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Tony Wicks (Apr 03)
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Brandon Butterworth (Apr 03)
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Jared Mauch (Apr 04)
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Jared Mauch (Apr 04)
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Tyler Conrad (Apr 04)