nanog mailing list archives
Re: jon postel
From: Daniel Sterling <sterling.daniel () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:28:25 -0400
One of the best things about this list is first hand accounts of our internet lore Does anyone have any stories about working with or near John they would like to share with the list? It would definitely make my day to hear more about the early internet Thanks, Dan On Sun, Oct 16, 2022, 8:01 PM Nathan Angelacos <nangel () tetrasec net> wrote:
Early unix had a similar philosophical debate. Everything is a simple file (including most devices), make commands which do one thing and do it well so they can be connected together in new ways (an almost prescient view on the ubiquity of multi-cpu/core systems), when in doubt generalize and let the user specialize for their needs, don't try to guess everything your program will be used for.Oh. you mean SaaS? or WebSockets? or REST? or :) I remember an old guy I worked with. We were decommissioning our Prime for this new thing called "Novell 286" He said "The computer industry is like the car industry in the 50's. We add more grille, more fenders, more wings. But it is still a car."
Current thread:
- jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Noah (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Dave Taht (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel bzs (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Nathan Angelacos (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Daniel Sterling (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Joseph (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Elmar K. Bins (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Grant Taylor via NANOG (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Carsten Bormann (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Grant Taylor via NANOG (Oct 17)
- RE: jon postel Adam Thompson (Oct 20)
- Re: jon postel Dave Taht (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Miles Fidelman (Oct 18)
- Re: jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel michael brooks - ESC (Oct 18)
- Re: jon postel Noah (Oct 16)