nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv4/25s and above
From: Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:37:31 -0500
On 11/19/22 3:12 PM, Douglas Fischer wrote:
I do not like mikrotik, but I need to say that RouterOS does support /31. All that you need to do, beyond set /31 at address for netmask, is check if the other address is defined at the network address.
Can you show some docs on this? I gave a subnet config to my customer of 255.255.255.254 and it wouldn't take it. I reconfigured it to a /30 (.252) and it worked for them. This was a on a RB2011 about 3 months ago. I search at the time showed it was a know issue. We laughed about it and moved on. -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net
Current thread:
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211220729.AYC, (continued)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211220729.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 22)
- Fwd: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211220729.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 22)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Matthew Petach (Nov 23)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211240353.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 24)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Dave Taht (Nov 27)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Bryan Fields (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Denis Fondras (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Douglas Fischer (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Bryan Fields (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Rubens Kuhl (Nov 19)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 18)
- ipv4/25s and above Sylvain Baya (Nov 19)