nanog mailing list archives
Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 12:26:59 +0300
On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 12:17, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
We have run into issues with platforms that have shipped with FIB's in favour of IPv4 and less for IPv6 and MPLS labels. Shifted around, you could give up whatever is left for IPv6 and ACL's to give more to IPv4, but you then end up losing native IPv6 scalability. And, of course, whatever other permutation you may think of that leaves you in a babysitting scenario for the protocol(s) assigned to peasantry.
You are always here. You always need to understand your scale and how much resources you have available, what is possible and what is not. Existence or non-existence of configuration toggle to affect this doesn't make that situation worse or better. It is not implied to be a tactical short-term fix, it depends and you must understand what you are doing to determine your position in any case. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- RE: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240, (continued)
- RE: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Tony Wicks (May 04)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Sabri Berisha (May 04)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Mark Tinka (May 05)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Nick Olsen (May 05)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Nehul Patel (May 05)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Nick Olsen (May 05)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Nehul Patel (May 05)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Nehul Patel (May 05)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Mark Tinka (May 06)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Saku Ytti (May 06)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Mark Tinka (May 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Saku Ytti (May 06)
- Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240 Mark Tinka (May 06)