nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers
From: Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 09:58:56 -0400
Yep. No one is forcing carriers to take USF money. They can essentially
build whatever they want without USF money. Unless of course USF funds are used to over build your already existing network. This is exactly the situation I'm in. On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:52 PM Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote:
I would say, if you’re looking to build or expand your networks, focus on how you can get the fiber out there, there’s a lot of money available if you’re willing to take it. It might mean taking the USF money and the obligations that go with that in reporting, compliance, etc.. but those costs don’t have to be onerous if you are mindful of how the programs work and have the right integration/reporting.Yep. No one is forcing carriers to take USF money. They can essentially build whatever they want without USF money. However, if they do take the USF money, what should be the absolute minimum delivery requirements? They can always build above the minimum. Its essentially a reverse auction. If the government sets the requirements too high, the carriers claim they will walk away and the long-tail of broadband doesn't happen. If the government sets the requirements too low, the carriers take the money and build less. The historical problem is carriers promise whatever it takes to win, take the money and don't deliver (or demand more money to finish).
Current thread:
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers, (continued)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (May 23)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Owen DeLong via NANOG (May 24)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Kord Martin (May 25)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (May 31)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Livingood, Jason via NANOG (May 26)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Andrew Odlyzko via NANOG (May 26)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers babydr DBA James W. Laferriere (May 26)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Dave Taht (May 27)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (May 30)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Josh Luthman (May 31)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (May 31)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers james.cutler () consultant com (May 23)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Owen DeLong via NANOG (May 24)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Greg Shepherd (May 27)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers james.cutler () consultant com (May 23)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Andrew Odlyzko via NANOG (May 23)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Bjørn Mork (May 24)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Chris Adams (May 28)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Randy Bush (May 28)