nanog mailing list archives
Re: MSA’s and network architecture
From: Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 11:30:43 +0200
Considered that, but that would be obvious - we need optics :-).
Agreed - but wouldn't it be fair to say that, nonetheless, the availability of an MSA supports the development of network architecture? With an MSA, there is some limited, common basis for a discussion in an ecosystem of vendors and network operators. That should support development of architecture. Cheers, Etienne On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:32 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
On 5/18/22 08:28, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG wrote:Just to add a bit of fun to the mix - perhaps multi-source agreement was intended :)Considered that, but that would be obvious - we need optics :-). Mark.
-- Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale Assistant Lecturer Department of Communications & Computer Engineering Faculty of Information & Communication Technology University of Malta Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
Current thread:
- MSA’s and network architecture Martin Hannigan (May 17)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Mark Tinka (May 17)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Martin Hannigan (May 18)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Saku Ytti (May 17)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (May 17)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Saku Ytti (May 17)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (May 17)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Mark Tinka (May 18)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Saku Ytti (May 18)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Saku Ytti (May 17)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Mark Tinka (May 18)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (May 18)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Mark Tinka (May 20)
- Re: MSA’s and network architecture Mark Tinka (May 17)