nanog mailing list archives
Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 16:03:13 +0900
Philip Loenneker wrote:
I have a tongue-in-cheek question... if the documentation provided by the plaintiff to the court, and/or the court documentation including the final ruling, includes the specific URLs to the websites to block, does that constitute transmitting links to illegal content?
Doing something authorized by law in a way specified by the law can not be illegal. So? Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services, (continued)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services John Levine (May 05)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Masataka Ohta (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Mel Beckman (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Jim Popovitch via NANOG (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Masataka Ohta (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Mel Beckman (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Masataka Ohta (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Mel Beckman (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Masataka Ohta (May 08)
- RE: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Philip Loenneker (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Masataka Ohta (May 09)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Masataka Ohta (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services John Levine (May 05)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Anne Mitchell (May 08)
- Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services Anne Mitchell (May 08)